J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > Volume 48(8); 2007 > Article
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2007;48(8):1096-1105.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2007.48.8.1096-1105    Published online August 31, 2007.
Interpretation of Frequency Doubling Technology Perimeter in Diagnosis of Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspect.
Jin A Choi, Chan Kee Park
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. ckpark@catholic.ac.kr
주파수 배가 시야검사계를 사용한 녹내장 및 녹내장 의증의 진단
최진아,박찬기
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence:  Chan Kee Park, M.D.
Abstract
PURPOSE
To find applicable parameters of the frequency doubling technology perimeter (FDP), which is known to be useful in detecting early visual field loss. METHODS: The subjects were 65 eyes of normal individuals, 58 eyes of glaucoma suspects, and 37 eyes of glaucoma patients. FDP (MD, PSD), SAP (MD, PSD, CPSD), and 5 parameters of OCT were analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity of each parameter were evaluated, and the comparison of FDP parameters by Pearson's chi-square was made between the glaucoma suspect group and the normal group. The same comparison was made among the normal+glaucoma suspect and glaucoma group. RESULTS: In discriminating between the normal and glaucoma suspect groups, the FDP-PSD revealed an AUC of 0.745 (cutoff: 3.17dB), which was significantly larger than that of SAP-PSD with an AUC of 0.660 (cutoff: 1.73dB). In comparing FDP, PSD by Anderson criteria was most reliable with a hit ratio of 0.732. On the other hand, in discriminating among the normal+glaucoma suspect group and glaucoma group, the SAP-PSD showed an AUC 0.971 (cutoff: 2.92dB), much larger than the FDP-PSD with an AUC of 0.863 (cutoff: 3.78dB). In addition, in comparing the parameters of FDP by Pearson chi-square, PSD 1% was the most reliable with a hit ratio of 0.813. CONCLUSIONS: FDP is a valuable screening tool in detecting early visual field loss. PSD by Anderson criteria can be a reliable parameter for the diagnosis of pre-perimetric glaucoma, and PSD 1% can be used in the discrimination of perimetric glaucoma.
Key Words: FDP;Anderson criteria;Frequency doubling technology;Preperimetric glaucoma;PSD


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next