J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > Volume 59(12); 2018 > Article
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2018;59(12):1129-1136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2018.59.12.1129    Published online December 15, 2018.
Clinical Efficacy of Bunny Multifocal Intraocular Lens after Cataract Surgery.
Myung Ho Cho, Jae Yeong Park, Byung Gun Park, Jong Soo Lee
1Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. jongsool@pusan.ac.kr
2Department of Opthalmology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
버니 다초점인공수정체의 임상적 효용성
조명호1⋅박재영1⋅박병건2⋅이종수1
부산대학교 의과대학 안과학교실1, 인제대학교 부산백병원 안과2
Correspondence:  Jong Soo Lee,
Email: jongsool@pusan.ac.kr
Received: 26 July 2018   • Revised: 21 September 2018   • Accepted: 27 November 2018
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare the postoperative clinical outcomes after cataract surgery and implantation using the BunnyLens MF® and ReSTOR® multifocal intraocular lenses. METHODS: Sixty-five eyes implanted with multifocal intraocular lenses were divided into two groups involving either ReSTOR® (39 eyes) or BunnyLens MF® (26 eyes) lenses. In these two groups, the distant and near visual acuity, astigmatism, spherical equivalent, and contrast sensitivity test were examined at preoperative and postoperative 1 week, 8 weeks, and 24 weeks. We compared the clinical efficacy between the two groups before and after cataract surgery using statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean value of distant and near visual acuity, and spherical equivalent of both groups after intraocular lens implantation were significantly improved, compared with the preoperative values (p < 0.05), while there was no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). The means of postoperative distant and near visual acuity, astigmatism, and contrast sensitivity test were not significantly different between ReSTOR® and BunnyLens MF® lenses (p > 0.05). The mean numeric error of spherical equivalent at the final postoperative 24 weeks was −0.17 ± 0.50 diopters (D) for the ReSTOR® lenses and −0.34 ± 0.52 D for the BunnyLens MF® lenses (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: BunnyLens MF® and ReSTOR® lenses showed no significant difference in clinical efficacy, including distance and near vision, spherical equivalent error, and contrast sensitivity test after cataract surgery. However, it should be noted that BunnyLens MF® lenses had a tendency toward myopic shift compared with ReSTOR® lenses.
Key Words: Contrast sensitivity;Multifocal intraocular lens (IOL);Visual acuity


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#1001, Jeokseon Hyundai BD
130, Sajik-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03170, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2271-6603    Fax: +82-2-2277-5194    E-mail: kos@ijpnc.com                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next