Comparison of 10-year Clinical Results between Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Surface Ablation for Moderate to High Myopia. |
Hyo Won Kim, Kyung Sun Na, Man Soo Kim |
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. mskim@catholic.ac.kr |
중등도 및 고도근시 환자에서 라식과 각막표면연마굴절수술 후 10년간의 경과 관찰 비교 |
김효원⋅나경선⋅김만수 |
가톨릭대학교 의과대학 안과 및 시과학교실 |
|
Abstract |
PURPOSE To compare the long-term prognosis of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and surface ablation in moderate to high myopia. METHODS: A retrospective study including 87 eyes of 44 myopic patients treated with LASIK or surface ablation from 1995 to 2005 was performed. Follow-up visits were performed at 3 months, 1 year, 5 years, and 8 years. All treated eyes were divided into 2 groups according to preoperative spherical equivalent (SE)- moderate myopia (<-6.0 diopters [D]) and high myopia (≥-6.0 D). The main outcome measures were postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, SE, mean keratometry, safety index, efficacy index, predictability, and complications. RESULTS: Mean SE was -7.05 ± 2.49 D in the LASIK group and -5.25 ± 1.23 D in the surface ablation group. The 10-year SE was -1.78 ± 1.22 D in the LASIK group and -1.35 ± 1.09 D in the surface ablation group, and there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups. At 10 years postoperatively, UCVA was log MAR 0.155 ± 0.161 in the LASIK group and log MAR 0.095 ± 0.140 in the surface ablation group. There were no significant differences in postoperative mean SE, safety index, efficacy index, or complications between the LASIK and surface ablation group at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: This 10-year follow-up study shows that LASIK and surface ablation for moderate to high myopia have no statistical differences in mean SE, safety index, efficacy index, or complications. |
Key Words:
Laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK);Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK);Myopia;Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK);Surface ablation |
|