J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > Volume 58(1); 2017 > Article
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2017;58(1):43-49.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2017.58.1.43    Published online January 15, 2017.
Comparison of Biometric Measurements and Refractive Results among Low-coherence Reflectometry, Partial Interferometry and Applanation Ultrasonography.
Sung Hoon Lee, Hyung Keun Lee
The Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. shadik@yuhs.ac
저간섭성 반사계, 부분 빛간섭계, 접촉식 초음파를 이용한 생체계측과 백내장수술 후 굴절력의 비교
이성훈⋅이형근
연세대학교 의과대학 강남세브란스병원 안과학교실 및 시기능개발연구소
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare the measurement results and the accuracy of the predicted refractive error after cataract surgery among 3 ocular biometry devices; OA-2000®, IOL Master® and A-scan ultrasound in posterior subscapular cataracts. METHODS: Biometry measurements including axial length, anterior chamber depth and the keratometry of 80 cataractous eyes were measured using ultrasonography, OA-2000® and IOL Master®. To calculate the intraocular lens (IOL) power, the SRK/T formula was used and 3 months after cataract surgery, the refractive outcome was compared to the preoperatively predicted refractive error. RESULTS: The number of eyes measured by the 3 devices (A-scan, IOL Master® and OA-2000®) was 57 (group A) and the number of eyes measured by 2 devices (A-scan and OA-2000®) was 22 (group B). When cataract grading was performed based on the Lens Opacity Classification system III, the severity of posterior subscapular opacity was significantly different between the 2 groups (p = 0.001). Although no difference was observed in the measured biometry values including axial length, anterior chamber depth and keratometry in groups A and B, the predicted refractive error was significantly different in group B; OA-2000® showed a significantly higher accuracy in predicting IOL power than A-scan. CONCLUSIONS: In cataract patients whose posterior subscapular opacity is not severe, the accuracy for predicting refractive error after cataract surgery was not significantly different among the 3 devices included in our study (A-scan, IOL Master® and OA-2000®). However, in patients with severe posterior subscapular opacity, OA-2000®, that provides a Fourier domain light source-calculated predicted refractive error of IOL may be more accurate.
Key Words: A-scan;Intraocular lens;IOL Master;OA-2000;Posterior subcapular cataract


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next