Measurement Comparison of Anterior Segment Parameters between AL-Scan(R) and Pentacam(R). |
Sang Moon Youn, Sung Hyup Lim, Ho Young Lee |
1Department of Ophthalmology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. 2Shinsegae Eye Clinic, Busan, Korea. happytriad@gmail.com |
에이엘 스캔과 펜타캠을 이용한 전안부 계측값의 비교 |
윤상문1⋅임성협1⋅이호영2 |
Department of Ophthalmology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine1, Busan, Korea Shinsegae Eye Clinic2, Busan, Korea |
|
Abstract |
PURPOSE To investigate the clinical availability of AL-Scan(R) (Nidek, GAMAGORI, Japan) by comparing anterior segment parameters measured with AL-Scan(R) and Pentacam(R) (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). METHODS: Seventy-three patients (117 eyes) who received refractive surgery at our hospital were tested with AL-Scan(R) and Pentacam(R). We compared measurements including anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, white-to-white, and corneal curvature. RESULTS: When comparing measurements obtained with AL-Scan(R) and Pentacam(R), the anterior chamber depth (p < 0.001), central corneal thickness (p < 0.001) and 2.4 mm zone K value (p = 0.038) showed significant differences; the white-to-white (p = 0.348) and 3.3 mm zone K value (p = 0.429) showed no significant differences. All AL-Scan(R) and Pentacam(R) parameters had a strong positive linear correlation (p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plots showed a high degree of agreement between AL-Scan(R) and Pentacam(R) in all parameters except for anterior chamber depth. CONCLUSIONS: AL-Scan(R) is convenient to use clinically because simultaneous measurements of ocular biometry including axial length, intraocular lens power, and topography are possible. However, because differences in some anterior segment parameters exist when compared with Pentacam(R), measurements with AL-Scan(R) may require comparisons with other instruments. |
Key Words:
AL-Scan(R);Anterior chamber depth;Central corneal thickness;Corneal refractive power;Pentacam(R) |
|