J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > Volume 56(2); 2015 > Article
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2015;56(2):219-227.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2015.56.2.219    Published online February 15, 2015.
Accuracy of Predictive Refraction in Combined Vitrectomy-Cataract Surgery for Epiretinal Membrane and Macular Hole.
Hyo Cheol Lim, Kyung Ho Kim, Min Kyu Shin, Sung Who Park, Ik Soo Byon, Ji Eun Lee
1Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea. isbyon@naver.com
2Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
3Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
4Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
특발성망막앞막과 황반원공 환자의 유리체절제술과 백내장 동시수술에서 굴절값의 예측정확도
임효철1⋅김경호1⋅신민규2⋅박성후2⋅변익수1,3⋅이지은2,4
양산부산대학교병원 안과1, 부산대학교병원 안과2, 양산부산대학교병원 의생명융합연구소3, 부산대학교 의학전문대학원 안과학교실4
Abstract
PURPOSE
To evaluate the accuracy of predictive refraction and the factors influencing the predictability in combined vitrectomy and cataract surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients who received combined vitrectomy and cataract surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular hole (MH), followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Preoperative refraction, target refraction, postoperative refraction, predictive refraction error (target refraction - postoperative refraction), accuracy of predictive refraction error (predictive refraction error was within +/-0.5 diopter), intraocular pressure, axial length, central macular thickness, and tools that were used for intraocular lens power calculation (A-scan and IOL master) were assessed by analyzing medical records. RESULTS: A total of 176 eyes (including 132 idiopathic ERM cases and 44 MH cases) were included in this study. The accuracy of predictive refraction error was 60.8% at 6 months and there was no difference between the idiopathic epiretinal membrane group (59.8%) and the macular hole group (63.6%). There was no significant difference in predictive refraction error according to axial length and tools (IOL master vs A-scan). Predictive refraction error correlated positively with preoperative refraction (r = 0.227; p = 0.002). In the ERM group, predictive refraction error correlated negatively with both preoperative central macular thickness and the change in central macular thickness between, before, and 6 months after surgery (r = -0.211; p = 0.015 and r = -0.241; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of predictive refraction error was approximately 60% in combined vitrectomy and cataract surgery. Postoperative refraction appeared to be myopia relative to target refraction with higher preoperative myopia and thicker preoperative central macular thickness. Hence, the intraocular lens power should be determined considering the above factors.
Key Words: Accuracy of predictive refraction;Combined vitrectomy and cataract surgery;Predictive refraction error;Refractive error


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next