J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > Volume 54(6); 2013 > Article
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2013;54(6):919-926.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2013.54.6.919    Published online June 15, 2013.
Comparison of Mean Deviation Between Integrated Binocular Visual Field and Monocular Visual Field.
Yeoun Sook Chun, In Ki Park
1Department of Ophthalmology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Ophthalmology, KyungHee University Medical Center, KyungHee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ikpark@khu.ac.kr
통합된 두 눈 시야와 한 눈 시야의 Mean Deviation 비교
전연숙1⋅박인기2
Department of Ophthalmology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine1, Seoul, Korea
Department of Ophthalmology, KyungHee University Medical Center, KyungHee University School of Medicine2, Seoul, Korea
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare the mean deviation (MD) between monocular and integrated binocular visual field (BVF). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with glaucoma in at least 1 eye were recruited for the present study. Seventy-two threshold sensitivities of the BVF were obtained without additional visual field test by the Best Location and Binocular Summation methods using the 2 monocular visual fields of central 30degrees. The MD of the BVF was obtained by comparison to the value distribution in the age-matched population with normal BVF. After defining the better eye with the better MD value from the 2 eyes, comparison of the MDs between individual eyes and the integrated BVF were assessed. In addition, the MDs between the integrated BVF and actual BVF were compared in 11 patients. RESULTS: In patients with a mean age of 58.7 years, the MD of the better eye was -2.3 dB, and the worse eye was -4.9 dB (p < 0.01). There was a significant difference between the 2 MDs derived from Best Location and Binocular Summation (-1.7 and -2.0 dB, respectively p = 0.045). The MDs according to BVF more improved than the better eye (p < 0.01 for both). There was no significant difference in MDs between integrated BVF and actual BVF (-1.9 vs -2.0, -2.3 vs -2.0, respectively p > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: The integrated BVF more improved than the better eye. When providing guidance to glaucoma patients regarding therapeutic decisions considering the MD of IVF may be important.
Key Words: Glaucoma;Integrated binocular visual field;Mean deviation


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next