J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > Volume 55(2); 2014 > Article
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2014;55(2):196-201.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2014.55.2.196    Published online February 15, 2014.
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Various Techniques of Intraocular Lens Dislocation Correction.
Jae Hong Sun, Jae Yong Kim, Myoung Joon Kim, Young Hee Yoon, Hung Won Tchah
Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hwtchah@amc.seoul.kr
인공수정체 탈구에서 수술방법의 차이에 따른 술 후 결과 비교
선재홍⋅김재용⋅김명준⋅윤영희⋅차흥원
Department of Ophthalmology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare clinical outcomes of various surgical methods of intraocular lens dislocation correction surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent intraocular lens dislocation correction surgery with and without vitrectomy by two seasoned surgeons, and compared postoperative best corrected visual acuity and spherical equivalent. Clinical outcomes of secondary intraocular lens insertion after primary intraocular lens removal and primary intraocular lens reposition were compared among the cases without vitrectomy. RESULTS: Dislocated intraocular lens correction without vitrectomy showed better postoperative visual acuity compared to procedures with vitrectomy (0.35 +/- 0.37 vs. 0.54 +/- 0.18; t-test, p = 0.001), but there were no significant differences in spherical equivalent (1.30 +/- 1.10 vs. 1.80 +/- 1.57; p = 0.24) between cases with and without vitrectomy. In comparing primary intraocular lens reposition and secondary intraocular lens insertion among the cases without vitrectomy, the outcomes did not show significant differences in best corrected visual acuity (0.28 +/- 0.40 vs. 0.40 +/- 0.37; p = 0.38) or spherical equivalent (1.66 +/- 1.43 vs. 1.07 +/- 0.79; p = 0.19). In comparing secondary intraocular lens insertion into the capsular bag and fixation to the sclera, iris and iris sulcus, the outcomes did not show significant differences in best corrected visual acuity (p = 0.49) or spherical equivalent (p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: The various intraocular lens correction methods examined did not show clinically significant differences in best corrected visual acuity and spherical equivalent when performed by experienced surgeons, except for better postoperative best corrected visual acuity in cases without vitrectomy compared to cases with vitrectomy.
Key Words: IOL dislocation;Scleral fixation of secondary IOL;Spherical equivalent


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next