Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2007;48(5):637-641.
Published online May 31, 2007.
Comparison of Pentacam with Orbscan.
Young Joo Shin, Nam Hee Kim, Dae Hwan Kim
1Department of Ophthalmology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Dongguk University International Hospital, Gyeonggido, Korea. schinn@hanmail.net
2Department of Neurology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Dongguk University International Hospital, Gyeonggido, Korea.
두 가지 각막지형도 검사에서의 각막 측정값 비교
신영주1,김남희2,김대환1
Department of Ophthalmology1 and Neurology2, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Dongguk University International Hospital, Gyeonggido, Korea
Correspondence:  Young Joo Shin, M.D.1
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare the corneal measurements of orbscan and pentacam in normal subjects. METHODS: From April 10 th 2006 to May 10 th 2006, subjects were tested by automated refractokeratometry (Canon RK-1, Japan), Pentacam (OCULUS, Germany), and Orbscan (Orbtek Inc, USA). Measurements included central, superior, nasal, inferior and temporal corneal thickness, radius of anterior elevation and posterior elevation, keratometric value and axis of the 4 mm zone, and anterior chamber depth. RESULTS: A total of 96 eyes from 48 patients were included, with 13 men and 35 women. Average age was 25.4 years old. In comparing the Orbscan and Pentacam, central, superior and temporal corneal thicknesses of the Pentacam were significantly thicker than those of the Orbscan (paired t-test, p=.000, p=.000, p=.003). The mean K value of the 4mm zone of the Orbscan was steeper than that of the Pentacam (paired t-test, p=.000). The anterior chamber depth of the Pentacam was deeper than that of the Orbscan (paired t-test, p=.000), but all of the Pentacam measurements were strongly correlated to those of the Orbscan. CONCLUSIONS: The measurements of the Pentacam and the Orbscan were significantly different, but they were strongly correlated. Both machines can be useful in clinical applications with partial compensation.
Key Words: Corneal thickness;Corneal topography;Keratometric value


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next