| Comparison of Stratus OCT and GDx VCC in Detecting Localized Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects. |
|
Young Cheol Yoo, Ki Ho Park |
1Department of Ophthalmology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kihopark@snu.ac.kr |
| 빛간섭단층촬영기와 가변각막보정 주사레이저편광측정기의 국소 망막신경섬유층결손 발견능력의 비교 |
|
유영철1ㆍ박기호2 |
|
Department of Ophthalmology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gangdong Sacred Heart Hospital1, Seoul, Korea / Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine2, Seoul, Korea |
|
|
| Abstract |
PURPOSE
To compare the abilities of optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation (GDx VCC) in detecting localized retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects of red free photography METHODS: Thirty six normal subject and 50 patients with localized RNFL defects were included in this study. Only one eye per subject was considered. The peripapillary RNFL was divided into 12 clock-hour sectors and localized RNFL defects were evaluated in these 12 sectors. To compare the diagnostic performance of Stratus OCT and GDx VCC based on the findings of red-free photography, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of each analyzer using a criterion of 1 > or = clock hours abnormal at the <5% level. RESULTS: The sensitivity (78.6%), specificity (94.4%), and AUC (0.872) of Stratus OCT were not significantly different from those of GDx VCC (83.3%, 94.4%, and 0.882, respectively) (McNemar test, p=0.75, 1.00, and 0.82, respectively). However, the sensitivity (64.0%) of Stratus OCT for superior RNFL defect was significantly lower than that (84.8%) for inferior defect (Fisher's exact test, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the sector average of Stratus OCT and the deviation map of GDx VCC were fair in discriminating localized RNFL defects, and the specificity of those were excellent. In addition, the diagnostic performance was not significantly different between two analyzers. |
| Key Words:
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve;Optical coherence tomography;Scanning laser polarimetry;Sensitivity;Specificity |
|
PDF Links
Full text via DOI
Download Citation
