PublisherDOIYearVolumeIssuePageTitleAuthor(s)Link
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society10.3341/jkos.2022.63.1.44202263144-50Effect of Mask Mandates on the Intraocular Pressure Measured via Goldmann Applanation TonometryWoo Seok Choi, Chang Hoon Lee, Chong Eun Lee, Sam Seo, Kyoo Won Leehttp://jkos.org/upload/pdf/jkos-2022-63-1-44.pdf, http://jkos.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.3341/jkos.2022.63.1.44, http://jkos.org/upload/pdf/jkos-2022-63-1-44.pdf
Scientific Reports10.1038/srep42067201771Agreement of patient-measured intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma patientsShaoying Tan, Marco Yu, Nafees Baig, Linda Hansapinyo, Clement C. Thamhttp://www.nature.com/articles/srep42067, http://www.nature.com/articles/srep42067.pdf, http://www.nature.com/articles/srep42067.pdf
Clinical Ophthalmology10.2147/opth.s3809420121967Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEKUri Soiberman, Shemesh, Shimon Kurtzhttps://www.dovepress.com/getfile.php?fileID=14589
Clinical Ophthalmology10.2147/opth.s55372009341Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry Netlandhttps://www.dovepress.com/getfile.php?fileID=4753
Eye10.1038/sj.eye.67018492005202191-198Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometryJ Y F Ku, H V Danesh-Meyer, J P Craig, G D Gamble, C N J McGheehttp://www.nature.com/articles/6701849.pdf, http://www.nature.com/articles/6701849, http://www.nature.com/articles/6701849.pdf
Ophthalmology10.1016/s0161-6420(98)91226-x1998105122260-2263Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patientsMario Gonzaga dos Santos, Stefan Makk, Andrea Berghold, Martin Eckhardt, Anton Haashttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S016164209891226X?httpAccept=text/xml, https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S016164209891226X?httpAccept=text/plain
Yearbook of Ophthalmology10.1016/s0084-392x(08)79158-52008200886-89Effects of Corneal Thickness, Corneal Curvature, and Intraocular Pressure Level on Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour TonometryJ.S. Myershttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0084392X08791585?httpAccept=text/xml, https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0084392X08791585?httpAccept=text/plain
Eye10.1038/eye.2010.83201024101555-1560Evaluation of agreement between intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure by Reichert's ocular response analyserJ R Ehrlich, S Haseltine, M Shimmyo, N M Radcliffehttp://www.nature.com/articles/eye201083.pdf, http://www.nature.com/articles/eye201083, http://www.nature.com/articles/eye201083.pdf
Clinical and Experimental Optometry10.1111/cxo.1262020181012206-212Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT‐80 non‐contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometryTarannum Mansoori, Nagalla Balakrishnahttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fcxo.12620, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cxo.12620
Eye10.1038/eye.2009.7720092371582-1588Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometryS-Y Hsu, M-M Sheu, A-H Hsu, K-Y Wu, J-I Yeh, J-N Tien, R-K Tsaihttp://www.nature.com/articles/eye200977.pdf, http://www.nature.com/articles/eye200977, http://www.nature.com/articles/eye200977.pdf