J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > Volume 55(11); 2014 > Article
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2014;55(11):1584-1588.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2014.55.11.1584    Published online November 15, 2014.
Comparison Results of Silicone Tube Intubation According to Syringing and Dacryocystography.
Jong Jin Jung, Sun Young Jang, Jae Woo Jang, Jung Hee In
1Myung-Gok Eye Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jwjang63@gmail.com
2Department of Ophthalmology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
술 전 눈물관 관류검사와 코눈물주머니 조영술 소견에 따른 실리콘관 삽입술의 성공률의 비교
정종진1⋅장선영2⋅장재우1⋅인정희2
Myung-Gok Eye Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Kim’s Eye Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine1, Seoul, Korea
Department of Ophthalmology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine2, Bucheon, Korea
Abstract
PURPOSE
To compare the surgical success rate of silicone tube intubation according to the preoperative lacrimal syringing test and dacryocystography (DCG) in adult patients with epiphora. METHODS: Medical records of 142 patients who underwent silicone tube intubation were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical results were divided into 3 groups based on postoperative symptoms and the syringing test results: Good, Fair, and Fail. Good and Fair were classified into the surgical success groups. We compared the surgical success rate according to the preoperative syringing test and stenosis site observed on dacryocystography. RESULTS: The success rates of silicone tube intubation were 88.4% and 87.4% in eyes with preoperative syringing results of totally-passed and partially-passed syringing tests, respectively, revealing no statistically significant differences (p = 0.838, chi-square test). However, in eyes with the preoperative syringing results of partially-passed syringing tests, the success rates were 66.7% in patients with canalicular stenosis, 83.3% in patients with nasolacrimal duct stenosis, and 94.5% in those with diffuse stenosis (p = 0.018, chi-square test). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found in the success rates of silicone tube intubation according to preoperative syringing test results. However, when considered together with DCG findings, the lowest success rate was found in eyes with the partially-passed syringing test and simultaneously showed canalicular stenosis on DCG. The syringing test results considered with DCG findings may help predict the success rates of silicone tube intubation.
Key Words: Dacryocystography;Silicone tube intubation;Success rate;Syringing test


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next